Quote:
Originally Posted by 220@NAP
Not sure if our tech guys tested these through ballistics gelatin yet or not. Most of our early R&D "tests" are for flight characteristics and durability/strength. Though we do shoot heads into gelatin as well.
As for a not-so-scientific test, I did have a guy send me a video (same guy as in a previous video) who shot both through a piece of tin backed with compressed wood. The 2-blade actually penetrated about 2" deeper through the barriers than the EDGE, though the POI wasn't dead nuts. The EDGE hit a the target high, and the barriers actually fell over, which may have had something to do with the difference in penetration, as the arrow likely lost momentum as the target/barrier itself tipped over ...
Of course, as odd as it may seem, the 2-blade is going to penetrate well, even with the large cut. The geometry of a standard 2-blade design means a more streamlined geometry in general—and the same is true of the 2-blade BR.
To this point, the vast majority of the critters shot with the 2-blade have been complete pass-thru's ... including several hogs, and a Kudu!
Either way, both of these heads are more than capable of deep penetration/pass-thru penetration ... especially on a deer sized animal.
I didn't think to take photos, but I just finished broadhead tuning my new Maxxis today ... and they do some wicked damage to a Block Fusion target as well, lol!
|
After much consideration I have decided to go with the bloodrunner 2 blade. I would love to have tried both but, with the lack of funds I had to choose one. The reason I asked if there were any tests on the bloodrunner or the T-head Edge because I intend to test the one I purchased on ballistics gel. Since there are no tests done on either I will try to video tape the test and provide pictures.