Thanks for the patience guys.....it's apreciated for sure.
With respect to support of wider cut options....easily done and already factored into the design should the demand allow cost justification for a particular width and the demand of the masses forces me to do it. However, as usual it seems....I'll buck the popular notion that wider is better. My study just doesn't support the overall bowhunting/lethal outcome being better by adding .5 of an inch of cutting width on a two blade design. And that is best for another discussion as it'll surely rub the fir the wrong way on many die hard folks whom are shooting a very popular two blade with that specific cutting width. Before a snap reaction to such a statement is made....I'd ask you to ask yourself this question first...With respect to that very popular broadhead/company......why did they come out with a "Low KE" version which just happens to sport a 1.5 inch cut after a year or two in the market with a 2" cut? If that wider cut is so much better...why REDUCE the cutting width? The answers are out there...you just need to get past the marketing stuff and see it for what it really is.
With respect to the support of multiple blade combinations which sport compressible cutting width technology....of course this engineering effort is easily accomplished and already in progress. Just not ready to run before we begin walking.
|